Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv; blam

I guess one more thing to consider - and something the bones might have something directly to say something about - is the longevity of teeth.

I would think that a toothless primitive man would be pretty much of a goner. And there would probably be all sorts of reasons to lose teeth.

I think Inuit would get cast out on the ice floes when they lost their teeth.

If you tended to lose your teeth around age 30 that would probably have a good deal to do with longevity.

Probably the transition from hunter-gatherer to agriculturalist would change the entire survival equation.


45 posted on 07/23/2011 11:24:47 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten (Welcome to the USA - where every day is Backwards Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

Maybe the main problem with teeth is, when they get a hole and infected, they’ll eventually absess and kill the person — and pulling the bad tooth is not without the same kinds of risks. The rise of toolmaking probably was the result of trying to protect the teeth, it wouldn’t take a genius to figure out what happened to the guy or girl in the tribe who cracked a tooth on a shell, bone, or stone.


56 posted on 07/23/2011 2:39:02 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Yes, as a matter of fact, it is that time again -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson