Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PzLdr
Hitler went to Smolensk to do what his generals wouldn’t or couldn’t; make a decision. Opposed to diverting Guderian’s panzers south were Brauchitsch, Halder, Bock and Guderian. Favoring the diversion were Rundstedt, and Kluge and Strauss, the commanders of Bock’s infantry armies, and the generals faced with [among their other tasks] protecting that right flank.

This is the first time I've heard that any major generals favored the move south. It appears many historians (at least the ones I've read) have neglected to dwell on this fact.

19 posted on 07/17/2011 4:49:54 PM PDT by Larry381 (If in doubt, shoot it in the head and drop it in the ocean!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Larry381

Most historians writing after the War were relying on the testimony, affidavits, studies done for the U.S. Army, by the German generals, including Halder. Their common themes were: all the mistakes were Hitler’s [if only he’d listened to us], and all the criminal acts were committed by the SS, including the same Waffen SS that saved their bacon more than once.

I first read of the dissension over the Kiev encirclement in, I believe, Alan Clarke’s “BARBAROSSA”.


22 posted on 07/18/2011 6:26:03 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson