I am trying to get people to think outside the box. To argue with the ingrained 'truths' that scientists have given us, and that we believe, but that may totally incorrect.
Just like Angkor Watt. They don't really know when it was built, or who really built it.
There are archeological sites where the structures were built long, long ago when the technology needed to create them was not available, and even now we cannot explain how it was done.
Most of our KNOWLEDGE is inferred from others, and most of it is INCORRECT. For all we know, the people who built Angkor Watt WERE around when dinosaurs (very large reptiles and mammals) still roamed the Earth. Then again maybe they weren't. Whether there were dinosaurs roaming the Earth is difficult to tell just because someone engraved it on the outside of a building. Heck, at our Museum they had life size dinosaur replicas on the sidewalk OUTSIDE the building. Would future archeologists claim the dinosaurs still roamed the Earth in 2010?
And I appreciate you trying to answer my questions, and am sorry you perceived me so negatively.
>> “Just like Angkor Watt. They don’t really know when it was built, or who really built it.” <<
.
SO what?
Why would it matter?
Actually, the written histories of the mongol peoples give a very good indication of when it must have been built, and the vegitation enveloping the structures gives a time frame close to 1000 years ago.
My point was that such an accurate depiction of a Stego indicates that they had a few stegos around to model, thus plowing another 65 million year hole in the dinosaur time table, to go along with all the written european discriptions of dinos only 500 years ago.