Replies

Of course I read it. It is NOT EVIDENCE. I am sorry if you are too much of a knucklehead to understand that a jury acquitted her, but they did! The case is over.

You are tilting at windmills, sputtering on and on about God knows what. It is irrelevant. You are irrelevant to the case, this whole conversation is irrelevant.

I read every salable of your unintelligible brain droppings and I am no wiser for it.

One more time for the studio audience and for those enjoying the program at home:

I THINK SHE DID IT! MY THOUGHT ARE NOT EVIDENCE. THEY DIDN”T CONVINCE 12 ORDINARY PEOPLE OF HER GUILT, THEY COULDN”T EVEN CONVINCE ONE. IT IS OVER SHE IS A FREE WOMAN.

96 posted on 07/13/2011 2:52:34 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)

To: Jim from C-Town

You did not read and comprehend what I posted.

99 posted on 07/13/2011 3:03:00 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)

To: Jim from C-Town

By your reasoning, most conversations would be “irrelevant.” When a little evil witch leaves her 2 year old to rot in a swamp and then 12 idiots let her go free, you can bet there will be “conversation” about it. And it’s more “relevant” than the drivel about weather, sports and the latest program on TV.

PS were you on the jury?

132 posted on 07/14/2011 12:49:36 AM PDT by kelly4c

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794