Many of us are damn well aware of what information was provided to the jury because the entire case was televised and there was 24/7 coverage. The jury here failed to do their job. People here on FR and elsewhere are perfectly justified in observing this and expressing their opinions because it is obvious. The jurists who have appeared on tv have come across and dumbs who accepted wild defense accusations without any factual basis and ignored facts presented by the prosecution.
Many people justifiably want justice here for a mother who clearly covered up her involvement in the death ofnher child and want to see both civil case success and to see what other criminal charges could be pursued. I see nothing wrong with that.
She is a free woman, as well she should be based upon the fact that she has been adjudicated not guilty in a court of law.
The jury DID their jobs. They debated the merits and evidence of the case in secret according to the instructions given to them by the judge and agreed upon by the defense and prosecution lawyers. They judged by their own conscience that they could not find the defendant guilty of any crime above lying to the police.
To speculate any further motives to the jury is highly unseemly. To judge them less intelligent than yourself is highly elitist and unfair. They did not ask to be jurors, they where compelled to sit on the jury by force of law. They where robbed of several weeks of their freedom and where separated from their families for days on end. We owe them our appreciation for doing their civic duty and nothing less.
Shame on you for unjustly accusing them of wrong doing. It is slanderous and mean spirited.
Regardless, all your ranting and raving is useless. there is no recourse. She is free to pursue her life to the best of her ability as any other person in this country.