Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim from C-Town

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241, Conspiracy Against Rights

This gets me an indictment, at least. It does NOT require operation under the color of law.

“This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).

It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.”


43 posted on 07/13/2011 8:08:07 AM PDT by MindBender26 (Forget AMEX. Remember your Glock 27: Never Leave Home Without It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: MindBender26; Jim from C-Town

Who is the second person that would be tried? I think she did it but I do not see a fed case.


52 posted on 07/13/2011 8:28:39 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
No way that that has any relevance to this case. Who was involved in a conspiracy? If she acted alone there certainly was no conspiracy. Who is she supposed to have injured, oppressed, threatened, or intimidated? She was judged not guilty of her daughters death, so she couldn't now be held liable for it in Federal court in any way,shape, or form without attaching Double Jeopardy.

You are beating a dead horse. She is not guilty by law.

How exactly is it fair to constantly badger this woman. This is the exact reason why there are laws against double jeopardy and vigilantism.

Let it go.

The State did the best it could. It was a difficult case with no direct evidence.

A jury of 12 citizens pondered the evidence that they where presented and concluded that the state didn't meet the burden. It wasn't even close, they only took ten hours to acquit.

Continued action against this defendant would constitute nothing short of prosecutorial abuse and subject the state to civil action by the Defendant.

There is a reason why the state's burden is high, they failed to meet that burden in the eyes of the jury. Case closed.

It is over, as it should be.

57 posted on 07/13/2011 8:54:25 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson