Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: indylindy
She received a fair trial. The prosecutors used every bit of evidence they had, they even had a ‘sniffer machine’ whatever that is. They simply could not prove their case.

What would Anthony have used to entice a witness? She is broke, her lawyer received less than $100K for the entire case, and she is universally loathed.

The state had a complete full court press of media and an unlimited budget and still couldn't tie her to the death, they couldn't even show a cause of death.

Casey Anthony probably killed her daughter or at least was involved, however we do not convict on probably. She was judged Not Guilty by a jury of her peers. Not Guilty is not the same as proved innocent. Our system worked precisely how it is supposed to work.

14 posted on 07/13/2011 7:31:56 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Jim from C-Town
They simply could not prove their case.

That is your assumption. Mine, is that the jury had a collective IQ that was the equivalent of a box of rocks.
17 posted on 07/13/2011 7:36:41 AM PDT by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson