So the juror is lying? I suppose you would say that anyone who had evidence or anything that challenges your viewpoint is lying? I can see how you would decide cases.
We can certainly see how you would decide cases...with no facts or evidence since you know very little about this case which is obvious from your claims.
Why don't you tell us how Caylee ended up in three garbage bags with duct tape on her mouth and no one but Casey had the time/opportunity to do it?
Casey was the only one who had a cell phone pinged to that location several times. Why don't you explain why Casey's car smelled 'like a dead body' coming from the person who lied under oath on the stand for her?
Why don't you explain why Casey was hiding out for 31 days and lying about where her daughter was, to the point of falsly accusing someone she didn't even know of stealing her daughter?
I didn't say the juror was lying. However, upon a reading of the evidence (the facts in the posted article, eyewitness statements, and the Greta interview/transcript) and an assessment of credibility, I have inferred that the juror MAY be lying.
And yes, that IS how you decide cases. And if this process is over your head I suggest you stay off juries.