Sounds like a capatible match to me...birds of a feather and that sort of thingy. BTW...I was reading Lazze's report with the police...Interesting he said Casey was breaking out in night sweats from nightmares a couple times a week.
Good grief, Charlie Brown, is this thread still going on? My internet was down most of the afternoon and half the evening and it’s still boogeying along.
http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2011/07/11/we-didnt-pay-him/#disqus_thread
Betty5
44 minutes ago
EXACTLY!!!!They should be drilled on common sense matters. For instance if a girl is out partying and the grandmother does not have the baby,,,the big question is....... Who has the baby? Especially is the partying gal does not have a job for a “:NANNY”. Poor trashy gal ...lying to all and her family should have had her committed.
Suny1
2 hours ago
Jurors needed to know what Beyond a REASONABLEq Doubt means. It DOESNT MEAN beyond any and all doubt !! Jurors shouild be investigated before they are allowed to make life and death decisions.
CaliClaire
1 hour ago
So now everything posted to be read on the ‘net is true? Please...
Anyways: That jury was sequestered, tired, & sans common sense. Period. The defense fed into their “inside the box” thinking; the pros kicked ass but in the end Casey & her pack of lies ruled the courtroom. I find it amazing that 12 ppl could find her guilty of the lies she told, yet the very things she lied about were what proved her not innocent to begin with.
Fujimooji
7 minutes ago
Yes, it’s true, he would acknowledge the jury with a “good morning” greeting .... and that, indeed, established a rapport. He outsnookered the prosecution with that tactic. And he should not have been allowed to do that. But you know lawyers, it’s all about “winning” and not about the murder of a little child.
angeltakenfromus
1 hour ago
I agree. I remember witnesses, forensic scientists, medical examiners use the term “common sense tells you”. Our experience/success in life will always come from some shape or form of common sense. These jurors didn’t have time to go over hardly any evidence. They got released, had to pick a foreman, have their lunch....there was about 400 pieces of evidence. Granted, they probably didn’t need to go through all of it, but they should have spent more time in this case. It was a forensic case.
Clemintine
1 hour ago
Good comment. I also don’t want to join the nasty club, but I think you are right. I heard a commentator today say that he thought the jury took the easy way out, the path that took the least thinking, i.e., oh, you can’t hand me simple proof ? I have to think” Never mind, let her go. Casey got away with murder and the jury got away with letting her get away? Maybe?
anita Dowdy
2 hours ago
I am not upset about this interview...if you say he is not being compensated...fine. I am upset over the comments of the jurors. “sick to our stomachs” “ did not say she was innocent”, and now this guy talking about having to put his name on the paper. Please spare us.....This is just as bad as Jose Baez, making that silly statement of “justice was served for Caylee” huh?? I come from a small rural community, may not be the sharpest tool in the box...but,I do have common sense. If I wake up in the morning, the ground is soaked, water puddles everywhere...common sense tells me it rained while I slept. Did not hear it, didn’t see it, but I know it rained. The shortest distance between two points, is a straight line. Caylee was in custody of her daughter, the last time she was seen, Casey did not report her missing for over 30 days, she lied to anyone who asked where she was. The next time Caylee is seen, was when her body was found. Common sense. What is the difference between Scott Peterson, and Caylee Anthony? Both cases were circumstantial. However, one sits on death row, and the other is going free. I do not think people should threaten or name call the jurors...however, we do not have to respect their verdict. The justice system works, and it doesn’t work. Casey Anthony and her attorney threw the dice and won. They threw alot of clutter, allegations, and innuendo to the jury cluttering the trial, and it worked. The jury was suspicious of George?? He was not on trial. There were no charges against George.I have no desire to see this interview tonight.These people can offer no explanation for their verdict. Murder One?? No. Premeditated?? No. But not even manslaughter?? They say they had no cause of death...was there a cause of death with Laci Peterson?? The perfect murder has come to light....all you have to do is hide the body in nature’s elements long enough to have a ‘dry-bones’ case and very circumstantial. Hire a lawyer who the bar has stated “he has little regard for the legal system”, and add a whole laundrybag of clutter....gas cans, affairs, etc., accuse everyone else, even the police, and medical examiner. And most important...pick a jury that gets confused over what they are supposed to do, and with very little common sense. These are the ingredients for the perfect murder!!! Sad........................
Newsieva
2 hours ago
I love you Greta,but I’m joining the people who are boycotting your interview,because we don’t want to hear these people’s lies.He votes her not guilty,now he says he believed she was guilty.He’s lieing and we don’t care what he says.
Just Me
2 hours ago
See Greta—commentators can’t convince us. You tried to insult my intelligence this morning by inferring I did not understand jury duty or the job of the prosecutor. Nice way to treat someone that told you they usually watch your show.
Americans are speaking loud and clear. No platform to explain the lost logic of this verdict. And no buyers remorse. But most importantly............
..........no CAPITALIZATION or promotion of casey anthony or those responsible for letting her go free
hide 2 replies reply