wouldn’t it be best to accept the jury’s decision understanding that they were the ones tasked with deciding and move on?
Well actually no it wouldn't be best, and that's why people arent't moving on,..but they are attempting to do something so it doesn't happen again. An example is the fact Casey waited to inform ANYONE her daughter was missing and frankly she didn't report it at all.....that's a very hard pill for any sane person to accept...regardless of her motives for doing so. Thus Caley's law is soon to be established.
Yes, the Jurors were the deciders.....the question remains how can we change the appointment of Jurors so, as an example, those who have crimminal records don't serve...etc. That the "peers" are not some lamebrained people not capable of critical thinking.
In those last three hours, and before actually, evidence should have been reviewed....unless of course it was simply a matter of manipulating Jurors to one side or the other...without that review. Which is what happened.
These jurors did not review a single piece of evidence....that speaks volumes of their lack of understanding of the "task" before them...as well... they did not take seriously their responsibility to do the hard work of examining the evidence to make their judgement.