[MizSterious]

But did he by any chance mention that one of the charges was child abuse/neglect? They found her not guilty of that charge. Yet (repeating myself yet again) THE CHILD WAS MISSING FOR THIRTY-ONE DAYS, AND THE MOTHER NEVER--NEVER--REPORTED HER MISSING. (The grandmother did after 31 days.) How was she "not guilty" of child abuse and/or neglect?

You and others make a big deal about people watching Nasty Grace and other shows--yet I see you are guilty of taking your opinion from a radio show. Snort. Levin, like all the others mentioned here, is a talk show host.

[commonguymd]

lol

[Dixie Yooper]

But did he by any chance mention that one of the charges was child abuse/neglect?

Yes he did, and the official charge was "Aggravated Child Abuse". As much as everyone imagines the word neglect was in there, it wasn't. And just for your information, Mark Levin is more than just a talk show host, He's Our Leader! Here's the link to his podcasts. Listen to the one from 7/05. It made me totally informed and a "so called expert" on this subject :)

[miss marmelstein]

Try not to argue with these fools, Miz. They listen to Judge Napolitano and Mark Levin - both, of whom, got this case wrong.

You are right and the jury came to a terrible decision and will have to live with the consequences as will CA.