HUH???? LOLOLOL..... did you say manslaughter was not one of the options the jury could have selected?? Yes, it surely was.
Wow, proof that many on this site who defend the lazy, idiot jurors do so without facts.
That’s fine if it was. I hadn’t come across any information suggesting that it wasn’t an either/or type of conviction. However, having said that, the prosecution still failed to prove its case.
You don’t convict somebody, just because you think they should be convicted.