Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: saminfl

Totally agree with you...and surprised at Ex-Hippie’s post...in the past, they have been pretty rational...(too many acid tabs, Ex-Hippie?)
Your point is exactly what I make when in this arguement...we saw everything and then some that the jury saw and were stunned that they came to the opposite conclusion.
And when ANYONE says that court proceedings shouldn’t be televised, I think USSR and forbidden copiers...


293 posted on 07/11/2011 8:06:01 AM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: matginzac
If you were a daily follower of this media circus, you saw a lot more (most of it highly inflammatory and prejudicial) than the the jury saw from the courtroom.

You saw arguments about evidence that were taken out of the jury's view. You saw motions that were taken out of the presence of the jury. Most of all you saw a whole list of media whores pumping up the public on a daily basis to get ever higher ratings.

305 posted on 07/11/2011 8:13:23 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]

To: matginzac

we saw everything and then some that the jury saw and were stunned that they came to the opposite conclusion.

<><><><><<

You are at least the 3rd tv watcher who claims to have seen all of the evidence. Weird. I had not heard that each and every piece of evidence (especially the photos of Caylee) had been placed in front of the tv cameras for the home jury to view.


507 posted on 07/11/2011 11:14:47 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson