To: RightFighter
So what youre saying is that if a body can be hidden well enough that by the time its found, cause and time of death cannot be determined, then youd be unwilling to convict anyone of killing the deceased despite a plethora of other evidence (including behavior) that the accused committed the crime? Seriously? If a dead child is thrown in the woods and it decays into a skeleton is it still a murder?
I'd love to ask Scott Peterson if he followed the trial on DEATH ROW.
240 posted on
07/11/2011 7:39:47 AM PDT by
central_va
( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: central_va
The jury surmised more money to be had on an acquittal than a conviction.
To: central_va
Can you believe that a CA jury actually got it right?
I guess this jury needed Casey to go sit on a rock in the woods near Caylee's little body a couple of times instead of reveling at her dissposal by partying and getting "the Good Life" tatoos...
259 posted on
07/11/2011 7:49:11 AM PDT by
CAluvdubya
(I STAND WITH SARAH....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson