Excuse me, dirtdiver, but I watched every minute of that trial that I could, I read every piece of evidence that was available, and I have a pretty good idea of what happened. I know enough to know that it’s not reasonable to think that the mother didn’t kill the child. Any jury who thought that was a reasonable conclusion simply didn’t look at the facts, or they engaged in wild speculation slanted by things that were said by lawyers which were not in evidence. The evidence pointed to the mother’s guilt, period.
So did I, from day 31. I can’t for the life of me understand what captivated me from so early on. Not media related, because I was stunned a girl was missing for 31 days and it was unreported. I remember discussing the Amber laws and how they didn’t apply to children missing for so long. I felt so bad for the grandparents at that time. When more information came out it became even more shocking, nannys that didn’t exist, jobs that didn’t exist, etc... So many didn’t even watch the trial but have opinions. I laugh at the ignorance. I laugh because they likely be the ones to help the profiteers profit off the little forgotten victim.
We’re you in the courtroom? No? hmmmm that may be an important factor, just maybe