Indeed! We shouldn't have expected them to do their due dilligence by going over any evidence. Afterall, they'd already been there for such a long time. /s
I was watching when the jurors left the courtroom for their first deliberations, several of them didn't even bother to take their notebooks with them. The judge had have someone gather them up for the jurors.
I really think there a lot of anger because the jury was so quick to come back and they never asked to look over a single piece of testimony or evidence. It really did appear that they were just tired of being there. What a great reason on which to base a verdict...
Oh, and in answer to an earlier question of yours to another poster....I'd love to serve on a jury, they just won't pick me. I called in for an entire month, went in at the beginning and again at the end of that month and still didn't get picked for any of the juries.
Its really pretty simple.
Was there proof of a crime? No, there was only proof that a death occurred. If you can’t prove a crime occurred then nothing else matters.
The prosecutors didn’t have the evidence. About the only action that can be taken now is against the defense attorney for his unethical behavior.