Posted on 07/11/2011 6:04:29 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
The woman, known only as juror number 12 left her job and went into hiding fearing co-workers would 'want her head on a platter'.
Her husband said before leaving she told him: 'I’d rather go to jail than sit on a jury like this again.'
He told NBC News he was worried for her health and had his bags packed ready to leave if his 60-year-old wife's name gets released.
The woman, who moved to Florida from Michigan fled the area, retiring from her job working at Publix Grocery over the phone because she didn't feel safe.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
The only time she cried was for herself when she knew the gig was up......can’t wait to see that taped drama.
I question that 400 figure....
the “evidence of eye witnesses” states..... “This jury foreman was mentioned repeatedly as one of those who took the LEAST amount of notes”..... and this was reported by those who watched them in detail every single day. I guess this would question then was it 400 notes he himself took as he indicated..or was it “others” notes.
Bottom line there wasn’t enough time given to those notes in the period they took to dileberate. Even if it was 400.
They did however spend time on that which they weren’t called to task for...and that’s if or not George Anthony was guilty.... who was not on trial. They crashed and burned by doing so.
I question that 400 figure....
the “evidence of eye witnesses” states..... “This jury foreman was mentioned repeatedly as one of those who took the LEAST amount of notes”..... and this was reported by those who watched them in detail every single day. I guess this would question then was it 400 notes he himself took as he indicated..or was it “others” notes.
Bottom line there wasn’t enough time given to those notes in the period they took to dileberate. Even if it was 400.
They did however spend time on that which they weren’t called to task for...and that’s if or not George Anthony was guilty.... who was not on trial. They crashed and burned by doing so.
I found this amusing and ironic (in light of this thread on FR) - there is only one comment after the long article detailing her crimes:
Sante and Kenneth Kimes did not commit these crimes. There was no motive, furthermore, there is no physical or forensic evidence to support these untrue allegations.
Thanks for reading it. These socioaths have no conscience. Therefore they cannot “repent” and “be saved”. To believe they can change is Pollyanna-ish, pie-in-the-sky liberal thinking.
I don’t think Casey will live as long as Sante has. Casey is too addicted to serious drugs: cocaine; huffing chloroform; ecstasy, and yes...xanax, aka Zanny the Nanny.
I am reading a book recommended on one of the threads.....The Sociopath Nextdoor....fascinating so far. I am reading it as fast as a novel. The lack of a conscience is unfathomable for most of us. It’s not like it’s just underdeveloped...it is non-existent.
You might very well be right Casey following in this womans steps. I won’t be surprised...nor that another death or several will follow her. She’s had a taste of it and found not guilty...which of course confirms to her nothing and no one can stop her from doing as she wants...and no doubt she will do so.
oops...I missed Casey’s involvement with drugs. How’d I miss that!!!!
I’m shocked, shocked I tell you. It's indicative of your emotional attachment to this case and the need to selectively choose to support your intense desire for vengeance and retribution.
Where'd you lift that from?
Of course there's a certain degree of emotional attachment for most who have followed this case, anyone with a heart would be affected....a little girl has been murdered and most do want to see whoever did this brought to justice....it didn't happen.
I don't have to be concerned one iotta about vengence or retribution..my God is very well equipped to handle that... now that the jury botched their responsibility before Him...for they all took an oath...and that was too Him.
But what I will do and continue to do so, as others who "care" that justice was not served for Caley, draw attention to the Jury and the system where Caley's case fell between the cracks...and shore them up.
Just in case you missed that tid bit of eyewitness evidence.
No doubt about it—Casey Anthony enjoys being a sociopath!
And getting away with it.
I guess they lied about the 400 pages then. Makes you wonder what else was lied about in this case doesn’t it?
No, I don’t have to guess what I think was or not lied about. But especially concerning anything Casey attests to. She’s a proven liar and so you simply don’t believe them..even when they are telling the truth.
As for the Jurors....they were handed Media packages on their way out the door....you don’t think the jurors themselves can see an opportunity to monetarily ride on this case? Of course they will...but for some it’s backfired...and one of those is the young 3o yr. old juror.
He hasn’t reached the developmental age where he understands that those who have gone before him can see thru and connect the dots of life and behaviors, which well trained eyes of experience and time well spent has developed.
Further, attempting to use reverse Psycology for some is also easy to spot.
Of course, Judge Perry was hallucination when he ordered his bailiff to pick up the jurors notes and bring them to his chamber. I got it now...is that you Baez?
I simply said it must have been a large pile.
Oh dear...now that makes a statement! Am glad she is safe now.
>> But our laws make this murder acceptable, just as was stated. It still remains a murder by definition.
It’s not murder, it’s not acceptable; it’s simply violent, legal killing.
Premeditated, illegal killing of one person by another is murder. Legal killing is not murder.
Murdering opposed to legally killing nascent life is merely a distinction of man’s law. The moral aspect is the same regardless of legality.
If you’re still uncertain, consider the percentage of authorized abortionists that have been convicted of murder since the turn of the Century.
As mentioned before the standard which this “killing” is made legal is what?
It’s man’s standard which he has determined legal, via it’s corrupt legal system which protects the guilty.
Where we differ is you appear to define murdere by mans law on abortion, where as I see it from God’s perspective..of which our laws were at one time based.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.