Posted on 07/11/2011 6:04:29 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
The woman, known only as juror number 12 left her job and went into hiding fearing co-workers would 'want her head on a platter'.
Her husband said before leaving she told him: 'I’d rather go to jail than sit on a jury like this again.'
He told NBC News he was worried for her health and had his bags packed ready to leave if his 60-year-old wife's name gets released.
The woman, who moved to Florida from Michigan fled the area, retiring from her job working at Publix Grocery over the phone because she didn't feel safe.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I made that statement not to engender pity but to point out that they had no outside influence on their decision.
>>And for this thread...the scroll bar is your friend.<<
Yep, it is, but it’s very educational to watch how people react and respond and how I will evaluate other opinions in let’s say religion threads.
You might read all the bible and then conclude better what God says about forgiveness...you are popcorn picking IMO.
Just as the Jury determined easier to to live with the easy verdict....it’s easier to quote scripture to re-inforce ones ‘opinion’ than to study the whole word of God...”rightly dividing the word of truth”.
Additionally we walk “by faith”...Christ had much to say about “legalists” and their self-righteousness flaunted before the people, and mis-leading them away from the truth.
Yep! I see cynbear continues to post to others but does not answer my post.
They let a murderer go free, their friends and neighbors don’t like it.....boo-hoo! Your theology you can keep. I am good with my Lord and God. Thanks anyway.
Well, so much for you knowledge. Greta verified that the jury foreman, for one, had something like 400 pages of notes. I won’t take the rest of your posts to me with much credibility.
see post 782...in reponse to this as well.
Did you think O.J. was guilty? I realize it was before the internet was popular, but did you express your opinion to anyone?
anyone notice the similarities between the people’s anger over the mess in Washington, healthcare and this sorry excuse of justice? WE THE PEOPLE are seriously ticked off. we want our country back!
You must not have these in your version of scripture?
MATTHEW 6:14 "For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. 15 "But if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.
MARK 11:25 "And whenever you stand praying, if you have anything against anyone, forgive him, that your Father in heaven may also forgive you your trespasses. 26 "But if you do not forgive, neither will your Father in heaven forgive your trespasses."
Just another example of ,Casey Anthony fallout, and every life she touches along the way....sadly she is enjoying the fallout for the focus ,though unfavorable toward her and the jurors, still keeps eyes on her, which is her objective. When psychologists tell people to "run" from sociopaths there's a reason for that....the trail of destruction they leave behind them is vast and all inclusive. Death follows them directly and indirectly as we have seen not just in CAley's death...but those life's who will never be the same for having been acquainted with her.
See post 789
When someone actually admits to not calling 911 when their child drowns, I will think that person is capable of doing evil.
try this one:
Matthew 7:3 Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?
I am judging the outcome of their actions, not their souls...big differnce. I never presumed to cross that line, but I see you do.
I didn’t watch much of that and really had no opinion. I was very busy during those years. I owned a computer store and computer networking business. The one thing I did think was ridiculous was the glove deal. Anyone who has owned a good pair of leather gloves know they shrink considerably when they get wet and if there is no stretching as they dry they there is no way they will fit again. I thought anyone who bought that nonsense was naïve at best.
Now there you go........a post I can relate to and accept. I, too, thought the jurors were fooled by that. What can you expect? A group of LA residents who never lived in cold weather and owned any leather gloves. Fools. Finally, we agree on SOMETHING.
Yep, that’s a good one. That’s why I have accepted the jury’s decision. I haven’t accused the jury of anything. I have consistently said that we were not in that jury and none of us know exactly what happened and not to judge what the jury did.
This is a very unusual case in that a child was not EVER reported missing by the mother.
A lot of democrats think Casey is guilty because they had access to the complete information in the MSM. They actually watched every minute of the trial.
Can you imagine if democrats also had the real facts when it came to politics?
Excellent point.
Mark 11:25...do note that this verse, (which is not found in the earliest and best transcripts of the NT), in verse 24 just preceeding it is written “Therefore”...which one then of course needs to view this in the context of all that preceeded this verse to “rightly divide the word of God”....and discern the context of who and why this was written. Which took place directly after Jesus cursed the fig tree...and cleared the temple with a whip.
Similar in Matt.6:14 Jesus was addressing those who had a tendacey to ramble on as the hypocrites do...”Be careful NOT to do your acts of righteousness before men to be seen by them. If you do you will have NO reward from your Father in Heaven” v:1
Unfortunately the diciples still needed to “get it” and were yet in the learning stages of their walk with Christ...... “but when I became a man I put away childish things”. Hard to change form a legalist, which many were, to one who walks by faith.
AFter Judge Perry released the jury to go into deliberations he had to have a bailiff pick up the jurors notes they had left on their chairs, bring them to his chambers so he could go over the notes and destroy them. They took scant notes as reported by the media in the courtroom watching them then left those notes in their seats when going to deliberate her guilt/innocence.
I realize facts are difficult for Anthony defenders to follow but is it too much to ask you do some research before speaking out on an issue?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.