Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: goodwithagun
Was the prosecution not allowed to take part in jury selection?

It seems Judge Perry has the final say. For example, the prosecution tried several times to dismiss Juror #4 based on her statement that she didn't want to judge anyone. The defense fought hard to keep her.

Judge Perry ruled for the defense, based on the Batson rule, which states that someone can't be dismissed based on race alone.

It had nothing to do with race! She didn't want to judge anyone and a trial is ALL about judging defendants and witnesses! Bad decision especially for the prosecution. I've heard this wasn't the only juror the prosecution wanted to strike using one of their 10 exemptions but Judge Perry wouldn't allow it.

25 posted on 07/10/2011 9:24:50 PM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: An American In Dairyland

Not only did HH judge Perry taint the jury by over riding the states right to strike 10 jurors of their choice, but he also calculated slutmom’s time served using time that was already used for the stolen check charges.

Why no outrage at this injustice? Why does the judge get a pass given these discretionary blunders?


28 posted on 07/11/2011 12:12:01 AM PDT by at bay (My father was born with 28 ounces of flesh in 1924 then went on to become Mr. (Glenn) Holland.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson