“You had no idea the evidence would be altered,” Baez asked.
“No,” he said.
The routine drying may have undercut the state’s investigation as much as defense efforts.
Had they been preserved as found and immediately tested, the maggot-covered paper towels might have provided a direct link between Caylee’s dead body and her mother.
Haskell said it is possible to retrieve human host DNA from lice, maggots, and even bed bugs. It is unclear whether the procedure was attempted given the state of the evidence.
The crime scene investigator didn’t know that evidence could be altered when drying it? Then it was unclear whether tests had been attempted. Can you imagine sitting in a jury and the crime scene investigator is shown to not know what he is doing? That alone would cause reasonable doubt about anything those investigators say.
Yeah, ALL of those investigators and forensics are faulty according to Baez. He also threw drowning against the wall with ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE.
There would have to be some huge conspiracy for everyone to be wrong and Baez to be right.
Maybe you should read ALL the evidence instead of commenting on a trial you obviously know nothing ot little about.
Here’s one, talking about desperate investigations, when they brought Casey to the medical facility to hear the TV broadcast when they found the body. These are hundreds of pages of deposition of two officers at the facility, aparently Baez was concerned about the treatment. It looks like investigators desperate to know whether or not Casey actually committed the crime, and this is in December of 2008. If they knew that she did it they never would never have done this.
Here are the two links if you can’t get to them from above.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/6629068/Casey-Anthony-Bill-Richardson
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/6629027/Casey-Anthony-Tammy-Uncer-transcript-1-june-2009