Replies

Why did the medical examiner declare Caylee's death a homicide? Because the poor baby had duct tape on her face for which there is no REASONABLE explanation except that somebody killed her

If you would read the Medical Examiner's Report Conclusion/Opinion at the top of this post, you would notice that it says "This duct tape was clearly placed prior to decomposition". This gives at least HOURS of time after the time of death where the duct tape could have been placed.

If you would actually understand that point made in the ME's Conclusion/Opinion, you would understand that it does NOT - I repeat - NOT - state that the duct tape was necessarily placed prior to death. Ergo, it does NOT state that the duct tape is in fact the murder weapon.

Nobody with duct tape on their face had it placed there for a reasonable reason.

Deviant murderers sometimes desecrate the corpses of their victims in all sorts of ways.

The defense in United States Courts of Law does NOT have to offer EXPLANATIONS. If you are arrested for a crime you do NOT have to explain how the crime happened in order to prove that you did not commit the crime.

The most obvious scenerio for duct tape on the baby's face - but NOT being the actual cause of death is very straightforward:

a) the baby was already dead

b) a person or persons were attempting to set up a scene at which searchers would find the body (let's call them the cleaner(s))

c) the scene was to look like an abducter murdered the child by suffocation with duct tape, then disposed of the body in the woods

d) the body was to be found within a few days - if it was, Casey would not be under suspicion because she would not have been partying for 31 days

e) the body was not found right away - so the cleaner(s) thought no charges would be filed against anyone without a body and they just hoped the body would never be found

f) Casey, instead of staying home and being in mourning, kept up her partying ways that caused her to fall under suspicion

g) Finally the body is found, making everyone assume that Casey was the murderer and she used the duct tape to suffocate the child, even though - again - if you READ the ME Conclusion and my comments at the top of this post - you will see that the duct tape is NOT claimed to be the instrument of murder by the ME. Please read it, it's not coming from me, it's coming from the ME report.

Occam's razor. The defense attorney stated in court that George helped dispose of the body. Who did he help Pieter? Simple, he helped Casey. But he claimed that Caylee had drowned in the pool. However, the baby was found with duct tape on her head stuffed in a garbage bag and tossed in the swamp. Did a molester put the duct tape on Caylee's head no matter whether it slipped or didn't slip? Well according to the defense attorney there was no molester only an abuser. Her name is Casey Anthony.

You're verbose but dense. When the defense attorney states that the baby was disposed of with the help of George, just who the hell do you think George was helping, the local child molester?

If you want to argue that the death was accidental and thus she should not have been convicted of murder, fine. But to argue that the duct tape, garbage bag and tossing of the body into the swamp wasn't the doing of Casey Anthony is unreasonable bordering on insane.

Comprende?