Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PieterCasparzen

A few possible points, taken from the website http://www.justice4caylee.org/t1208-who-s-who-in-the-anthony-case :

Early police investigators included a team from the Sex Offenses unit;
The Sawgrass Apartments, where Casey said the nanny lived, was home to the employer of Casey’s sometime ‘boyfriend’ Lazaro/Lazzaro/Lazarro and this person, who was a ‘director’ of ‘Society Entertainment’ also did some work for that ‘Fusion’ club which Casy frequented and where she met Lazaro.
Casey had expressed an interest in possibly having Caylee ‘adopted’.
Did Casey sell or ‘rent’ her child to pornographers or child predators? Therefore she didn’t want to expose them to the police? Did those people kill Caylee?
I hope the police don’t give up investigating. This whole case is so odiferous.


44 posted on 07/10/2011 10:05:33 AM PDT by Anselma ( "We will break the middle class between the stones of high taxes and inflation." - Lenin (&BHO?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Anselma

Casey did kill Caylee. This sex offender thing may be true, but Casey killed Caylee.


45 posted on 07/10/2011 10:39:14 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Anselma

The Fusion club, etc., the whole crowd, i.e., her “friends”, that’s a suspect-rich environment. The boyfriend, etc., would have spent time with Casey. They all seem to be saying they had no idea she was this “crazy”; that sort of talk, from the one or two guys I saw interview clips with. Again, they all may be knowing what “went down” both during the crime and in the courtroom, and all understanding that if nobody talks, everybody walks.

That’s where I would have investigated, but asked them all about their views of the world, get them talking, just get huge depositions, with some day/date particulars sprinkled in throughout. Much harder for someone to keep a fake timeline straight in their mind under that kind of friendly but long interrogation. A few other techniques as well. I’ve always found that if you listen, you find out things.

The departments that handled this case demonstrated that they will never be able to solve this, so they really, most unfortunately, should not waste another penny on it. If someone speaks out, possibly years from now, the case might break, but it’s highly doubtful. When you think about it logically, Casey has no reason to talk - she was acquitted and the last thing she wants to see is the inside of a courtroom - for any reason. And all the drug-sex-cabal she’s involved with, the bella vita crowd, no one is ratting on anyone, I don’t believe. All they would have to look forward to is prosecution.

My questions are for George and Cindy. If they are under the belief that this was an accident, it would make sense that they feel closure and no need to find out anything else. If they believe that Casey murdered Caylee, they may be very upset, but Casey can’t be tried again. But they would probably be utterly tired of Casey’s lifestyle. If they think someone else murdered Caylee, they would presumably want to see the murderer identified and then tried and convicted. So it will be interesting to see what they do over the years...


60 posted on 07/10/2011 11:23:06 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (It's not difficult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson