Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear
That's strange....

ON O'Reilly he said the tape WAS on the mouth/nose area

... and demonstrated how it was placed.

....except of course, the skin of her face was gone and it was loosely draped on her skull...

..and how it wrapped from the front to the back.

924 posted on 07/08/2011 9:13:25 AM PDT by Guenevere (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 885 | View Replies ]


To: Guenevere

Prosecutor Ashton is on In Session now. He just got done saying the tape was still over the place he described at trial. We know that it was because the defense did not object.

There were a piece laying near there, but that is what bozos are using to try to claim the tape was not where it was described as being.


927 posted on 07/08/2011 9:20:01 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 924 | View Replies ]

To: Guenevere
>>..but this one is perfectly in line with the top portion of the skull because of the duct tape holding it in alignment!<<

>>ON O'Reilly he said the tape WAS on the mouth/nose area<<

I saw both interviews. He did say that is where the tape was when they found to corpse but said on Greta that it could possibly have been moved their by movement of the water during a storm or other causes. Do you wonder if he vacillates why the jury didn’t see the conviction and allowed for reasonable doubt?

933 posted on 07/08/2011 9:32:52 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 924 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson