To: CynicalBear
Could animals or water have moved the tape around? Yes, it's possible, but is it a reasonable possibility? The tape was holding the jawbone in place. There are a zillion possibilities, even a skunk ape tripping over her skull while walking through the swamp, or a meteor hitting close by and tossing a nearby piece of tape onto the skull, which also happens to be the same exact unusual tape as found in the Anthony home. But none of them are reasonable, obviously.
You're not cynical, you're obtuse.
892 posted on
07/08/2011 7:37:56 AM PDT by
ZX12R
To: ZX12R
Have you heard anything about the photos taken from th Anthony’s that are sealed?
Basically Caylee child porn?
895 posted on
07/08/2011 7:42:03 AM PDT by
dforest
To: ZX12R
>>The tape was holding the jawbone in place.<<
The prosecutor says that its possible that tape moved there later and you tell me that it was secured so well as to hold the jawbone in place? That defies logic.
Lets look at that statement. If the tape was put there before decomposition set in it would have been stuck to skin, NOT BONE. After decomp there would have been no skin for it to adhere to so no holding could be attributed.
If the prosecutor would have believed that statement he would have answered that the tape was placed in such a fashion that it was still holding the jawbone in place so could not have moved when asked by Greta.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson