I did not in any way give an opinion that I thought it was a cover up.
I simply, when asked what could possibly be an explanation for the tape being there, gave different scenarios that I could think of off the top of my head.
For the record I have no idea, nor does anyone else, know what caused Caylee’s death or how she ended up in the place she was found. The person who asked the question was trying to insinuate that the tape on the skull was some kind of proof of murder and that her mother put it there. I was simply pointing out that the prosecution did not, nor could they, prove that. Read the thread to get context.
When you take things out of context you end up thinking the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Casey murdered Caylee.
“When you take things out of context you end up thinking the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Casey murdered Caylee. “
No it’s you taking every single piece out of context you m-——n!
Wow--your perception of reality is second only to Casey Anthony's twisted truth. Nobody asked you to offer alternate fantasy ideas. Nobody took your post out of context. In post # 583 I stated: NO ACCIDENT results in duct tape covering the mouth and nose of a toddler.
You replied by arguing: But trying to cover up an accident might.
To reiterate: nonsensical foolery does not equal reasonable doubt, and your credibility is in the toilet.