>>That’s a lie...give the quote with a link.<<
That’s a rather serious accusation in a public forum.
State attorney Lawson Lamar said Tuesday after Anthony was found not guilty of killing her 2-year-old daughter that the case was very difficult to prove. Lamar also said the delay in recovering Caylee Anthony’s remains was a considerable disadvantage.
http://www.krem.com/home/Casey-Anthony-acquitted-of-murder-.html
When asked if we will ever know what really happened to Caylee, Ashton said, definitively, “No, we never will. We never will. Because even if Casey got out of jail and wrote a book and said it, I don’t know that any of us would really know if we could believe it or not.”
Ashton also said he does not believe anyone but Casey Anthony will ever know the truth about what happened to Caylee.
Read more: http://www.wesh.com/casey-anthony-extended-coverage/28460647/detail.html#ixzz1RR0HHX4Q
If the prosecutor says after being asked if we will ever know what happened to Caylee “No, we never will” what would suggest the jurors convict on? If he says that there is not “anyone but Casey Anthony” who will “ever know the truth about what happened to Caylee” how in the name of all that is good should we expect a jury to convict on anything. The prosecutor himself couldn’t even say without “reasonable doubt” what happened to Caylee. It’s preposterous to expect a jury to then convict on “something”.
Would you care to apologize for the lie comment?
So no one will ever know.. oh well it was just a 2yr old child, why bother with it right?
“Would you care to apologize for the lie comment?”
No, but I would apologize for your presence on this forum to any newbies or lurkers thinking this poster is representative of the intellect herein.
What Ashton conceded was the EXACT sequence of events we can, of course, not know, short of a videotape. He also said he was confident he proved murder one. Do you know exactly how Laci Peterson died? Was she dead before or after she was placed in SF bay? How do you know a satanic cult didn’t sacrifice her? We will never know unless Scott elects to talk from death row. Yet the compelling proof in that case was also his lifestyle and being able to place him in the SF bay area.
Granted, Geragos wasn’t half the con man Baez turned out to be. I’ll give this to the defense-—they put up so many smoke and mirrors that the local smoke and mirrors wholesale supply store was forced to close temporarily for being out of stock.
No, you don’t have the ability to see even the biggest of distinctions.
You stated, ““but even the prosecutor admitted in an interview that they couldn’t prove it was a murder or an accident.”
The prosecution never stated they couldn’t prove it. They believe they did prove it. They believe the jury couldn’t see it.
“Ashton also said he does not believe anyone but Casey Anthony will ever know the truth about what happened to Caylee.”
Again, you don’t have to prove “cause of death” to prove a murder case. Ashton believes Casey knows how she was murdered because the facts indicate that Casey killed the child.