[central_va]

“Oh, wait a minute..how about arson?”

I've got you now, CHILD ABUSE and MANSLAUGHTER WERE charges she could have been found guilty of. If you really did follow the trial you would have known that. The jury basically said the Casey had nothing to do with the crime. What makes you a moron is that you are commenting about something you KNOW NOTHING ABOUT.

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

Relax...On a capital murder trial, you can’t later say oh, manslaughter...oh, ok we’ll take that one, but change the capital murder part.

The jury DID NOT say Casey had nothing to do with the crime. she was NOT aquitted of anything. The jury said, what she was charged with was NOT PROVEN by the prosecution.

BTW...keep those personal insults coming..they had so much to your arguments.ha.

[DejaJude]

CHILD ABUSE and MANSLAUGHTER WERE charges she could have been found guilty of

I can't understand how the jury couldn't convict on at least the child abuse charge. It's textbook neglect to know your child is missing and not contact the police immediately!

[CynicalBear]

>>The jury basically said the Casey had nothing to do with the crime.<<

They did NOT. The simply said the state did not prove “beyond a reasonable doubt” that she should be convicted on the charges they persued.