Did you ever hit the nail on the head.
Absolutely no evidence that it was an accident but that is what the jury thought according to the alternate juror. BTW, how did he know since he didn’t sit on the jury to deliberate? Jury misconduct for discussing the trial before deliberations? I have more circumstantial evidence of that then they had of an accident.
RE: this alternate JUROR stating THEY thought it was accident or not proving GUILT.
HOW did he know that, IF and unless he/they all talked after being admonished by the great JUDGE PERRY, everytime he dismissed them.
They got some Splaining to do.
I also heard tonight that JUROR #3 said none of them thought she was innocent. WHAT the hell is going on here.
Can't they read? and are they all DEAF as well a being DUMB, when they don't head the Judge's admonishments of not discussing the case.
The Jury instructions as to the Charges were Read over and over and over. If they still did not understand, help was just a click or a tap on the door away.
There was more Circumstantial Evidence in this Case than there was in the Scott Peterson or the Melanie McGuire case and they are now both in PRISON, as Casey should be.
McGuire remember is the woman who drugged and the chopped up her husband, stuffed the remains in 2 suitcases and threw them in the river. All circumstantial.
This Jury simply was to lazy it appears to have listened to anything, or it was a Runaway Jury. If what I heard about what Juror #3 now says, something went very wrong here and is SUSPECT. YET, each confirmed their verdict in open court when polled by the Judge.
The Prosecution in this case was masterful and cut to the quick. They were simply ignored, or they proved their case and JURY checked the wrong BOX, by "ACCIDENT Snowballing out of Control."