Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30

If the prosecution had charged her with something that she’d serve 20 years, Casey probably would have been convicted. “ ====

The lesser charges you spoke of were in the indictment. They were availed to the jury. The jury chose, instead, the popcorn soap opera of the family disfunction over the circumstantial evidence they were did not understand. They identified with the soap opera entirely and must have skipped every science class they ever had, which left them closed to the obvious. (In my humble opinion.) :)


46 posted on 07/05/2011 6:42:51 PM PDT by RitaOK ( We hang together or hang separately. 2012, or bust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: RitaOK

If they had the option of going for something lesser, but chose to absolve, then that definitely was a mistrial.

I was under the impression the prosecutor was going for broke.


54 posted on 07/05/2011 6:49:05 PM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson