There are three choices here ~ someone killed her, she killed herself, she's still alive but someone made a mistake with the DNA.
If someone killed her it could be an accident, on purpose, or some other reason (disease perhaps?).
If it was an accident ...... then let's look at the subsequent behavior. If it was not an accident..... then let's look at the subsequent behavior. If it was disease..... let's check for bacteria and viruses.
It's at that second stage ~ Casey's behavior ~ that was examined pretty good and yup, there she was dancing up a storm, partying to beat the band ~ at a time when it was otherwise demonstrated she had to know where Casey was!
There are people unable to follow a logical progression ~ they have their place in this world, just not on juries.
The Prosecution can’t proe she was killed with duct tape. There were no soft body tissues left - only a skeleton and duct tape. The duct tape could have been applied post mortem.
Her mother’s behavior was abnormal, but then she is a very abnormal human being - that doesn;t necesssarily equate to murderer.
The Prosecution failed to produce SOLID EVIDENCE that Casey murdered her child, just a series of pictures of a very abnormal individual.
Look at the Chloroform searches. The Prosecution called in two experts - one claimed over 100 hits on that subject were found, the other only one.
You have skeletal remains with duct tape and with DNA indication on the duct tape, you have the mother’s car with a stench of death in it.
You have conflicting testimony from the father.
We know the kid is dead. We know that some untoward actions were taken with respect to the remains. We know the mother has abnormal responses to the death. That’s all - nothing more.
The Prosecution can’t proe she was killed with duct tape. There were no soft body tissues left - only a skeleton and duct tape. The duct tape could have been applied post mortem.
Her mother’s behavior was abnormal, but then she is a very abnormal human being - that doesn;t necesssarily equate to murderer.
The Prosecution failed to produce SOLID EVIDENCE that Casey murdered her child, just a series of pictures of a very abnormal individual.
Look at the Chloroform searches. The Prosecution called in two experts - one claimed over 100 hits on that subject were found, the other only one.
You have skeletal remains with duct tape and with DNA indication on the duct tape, you have the mother’s car with a stench of death in it.
You have conflicting testimony from the father.
We know the kid is dead. We know that some untoward actions were taken with respect to the remains. We know the mother has abnormal responses to the death. That’s all - nothing more.