That has no bearing on whether he has handled himself well in this trial or not. That is the only issue that makes any difference regarding this judge. We care not what he did in 98 as it was nothing to do with courtroom action.
If you can't separate the two, then you are going to have huge problems representing future clients. What you are doing to the judge would actually be considered inadmissable going to relevance if he was the one on trial.
I’m just saying don’t build this smirking ‘judge’ up to be a hero. He’s not worthy of respect.
He has ruled unfairly against the defense several times.
He sits there all rared back with his smirk and looks like he’s just waiting for her to get the needle.