Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton
keep telling yourself that lie. Maybe one day—you’ll believe it.

It's true. Even if some people are correct in that Macs get far less malware purely because of the lower marketshare, it still remains a fact: Macs get less malware. So does Linux. Thus posting that a Mac or Linux switch will lessen your malware problems is helpful and absolutely true advice. Relatively within Windows, suggesting to upgrade from XP to Win7 to lessen malware is also helpful and true advice. That doesn't mean such posters are spreading FUD about XP. "FUD" does not mean "any post you don't like."

You know if it was truly secure this wouldn’t happen.

I can make any computer truly secure by unplugging it and filling it with concrete. Otherwise, all running computers are susceptible to being hacked. The question is the relative security, and Mac easily has Windows beat. It's not my fault the security people want a MacBook Pro more than they want a Sony Vaio running Windows. Windows would have been hacked first had the desire been reversed.

111 posted on 06/29/2011 10:55:09 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat

Funny you added linux to the mix...at least most linux people understand that it is susecptible to getting a virus and that it has as many if not more security issues as Windows over the years. only Macbots believe OSX is more secure than the current flavors of windows and Linux.


116 posted on 06/29/2011 11:31:29 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson