[Norm Lenhart]

Don’t get excited everyone. In mere seconds the post will be filled with those telling us what a waste of time and a distraction and how we can’t win with this issue and....

And the whole concept of right and wrong, legal and constitutional issues will again be ignored because the anti-birther brigade will ‘not’ be ignored.....

[American Constitutionalist]

" Don’t get excited everyone. In mere seconds the post will be filled with those telling us what a waste of time and a distraction and how we can’t win with this issue and.... "

Norm ? what makes this case different is that it is the Supreme Court making this decision allowing discovery.
Is not ? the Supreme Court in a indirect way saying that , yes, Obama is not eligible, but, the states need to take care of this, not the Supreme Court ?....

There you go OBots and Obama supporters, the US Supreme Court in this case has said that we do have the right and legal standing to question Obama's eligibility to be president.
Now only ? if the proper legal authorities were to take a 2nd look and investigate Obama's records.

[BladeBryan]

Norm Lenhart wrote: “In mere seconds the post will be filled with those telling us what a waste of time and a distraction and how we can’t win with this issue and....”

And we bat 1000 on that.

Really, at this point, have people not learned to question Orly Taitz’ legal theories? A glance at the decision she’s citing shows that it is utterly irrelevant to Barnett v. Obama. Carol Anne Bond has standing for a 10’th Amendment challenge to a federal statute because Bond herself is being prosecuted under that statute, plus there’s no question that a verdict favorable to Bond would provide remedy.