Nevertheless, as written, the article boils down to "one guy said/ but the other guy said". The court manager says the stoning sentence was for real. The rabbinical judge, Levin, denies it. If Levin's right, then he's been slandered. If he's wrong, then he's a liar. Wouldn't there be a written court record?
A typical instance, is that of a Rabbi who preached that the reason why the earthquake struck Japan, was because the Japanese had imprisoned some Hassidic youths who were caught drug trafficking. Hmmmm ...
But this story is without any confirmation. It is all hearsay testimony, and I don't believe it.