Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kirkwood
The image was obtained by amateur astronomer R. Jay GaBany.

The "Seeing" or sky/atmospheric conditions were likely better than when the previous image was obtained. Or, he obtained a better camera/equipment, lol..

Either way, it's light years better than mine M51 below. Of course, he's operating in much darker skies than I, and I believe his scope is twice the aperture.

M51--About 37 million light years out. Shot on 5/30/2010, 40D- 10" SCT 35x120 second exposures W/8 darks, @ISO 800 - 6.3 focal reducer-Astonomik LP filters.

M51 is really a spectacular galaxy.

6 posted on 06/11/2011 6:42:43 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: dragnet2

It really amazes me, that astronomers with “serious amateur” can do much more in their own backyard today than Mt. Palomar could 50 years ago. I built a very early black/white CCD camera design maybe 15 years ago, but I have too many hobbies now and too little time. But I like seeing OTHER peoples’ astronomical images...


7 posted on 06/11/2011 6:47:15 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: dragnet2

Excuse my ignorance, but does that picture show what it looks like it shows? That is, it looks like a “double galaxy” (if there is such a thing). Or is it two galaxies distant from each other that merely appear side by side because of the viewpoint?


10 posted on 06/11/2011 6:52:50 PM PDT by PENANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson