Posted on 06/10/2011 11:18:16 PM PDT by Private_Sector_Does_It_Better
Who will you support?
The leftist, biased media wants Sarah to run. They are obsessed with her.
that's where I'm at. GOP be damned.
If necessary we have to look at 2012 like the 1964 and 1976 GOP primaries.
Even if we don't win this time, we will have cleansed the party and laid the foundation for extended dominance.
Do not surrender.
Stay true to principle.
Remember, the most influential and enduring lights of the GOP lost more than once.
Again, do not surrender.
IMHO we need someone who will aggressively attack Obama’s record with tenacity.
That’s my decision and it won’t change!
Sarah Palin is the ONLY choice.
It's a secret ballot, so vote for whomever you think would be the best president for this country. I think, with the support she has here, and the nature of the tea parties and the organizing ability of tea partiers, she could win even through a write-in campaign.
No they don't. They've been trying to destroy her for years. They can't come up with anything, so they have to make stuff up.
You’re right about him of course and she brought him the TEA Party vote. Sarah Palin campaigned her heart out for him and he could end up her VP or on the 1% chance she doesn’t run, she would likely endorse him over the others if he runs, barring Jim DeMint’s entry, that is.
Obama Promises; Perry Delivers
http://www.thecypresstimes.com/article/News/Opinion_Editorial/OBAMA_PROMISES_PERRY_DELIVERS/46548
“As the longest serving active governor of the second largest state in the United States, Rick Perry is getting things done and his record speaks for itself.
Texas is the model all states should follow, and it is because of Perry’s leadership that Texas is thriving. Texas is a business-friendly, right-to-work state with all of the things that make businesses want to be here. Where are the jobs in California? They’re in the Lone Star State. With low taxes, limited government involvement and an affordable cost of doing business, Texas government gets out of the way and lets the private sector work. Texas knows that the more power government has, the less freedom the people have.
In addition to the favorable economic climate that Texas possesses, you can bet that under Perry’s leadership, our energy policy would change dramatically. We would no longer be held hostage by the very nations who wish to do us harm. In the words of Sarah Palin, I believe Perry would say, “Drill, baby, drill.” This would kill two birds with one stone. 1. We would be able to reduce gas prices (and food prices and all of the other goods and services that are effected by the rising cost of oil), and 2. We would put a lot of people to work.
As governor of the largest border state, you can also be assured that Perry would take a tough stance on illegal immigration. One of my favorite visuals was seeing Perry meeting Obama on the tarmac after repeated attempts to communicate with the administration were ignored. Attempts to have enough (not just more) boots on the ground to protect and defend our nation’s border and our citizens’ security. “
Really think Palin will step up and try to save the country with our help.
same here. Palin or bust. I refuse to settle for anyone less.
On the contrary, the reason they want her to run is because they think it will be their opportunity TO destroy her.
I won’t cross that bridge until I come to it.
I think the Republican nominee will be one of these four people: Rick Perry, Tim Pawlenty, Sarah Palin, or Mitt Romney. In the Missouri primary I will vote for either Perry, Pawlenty, or Palin, whichever I think has the best chance of beating Obama. Right now I’m thinking that will be either Perry or Pawlenty.
I'll see if Bachmann 'has it' in the coming debate but for now I'm not happy with the present field.
Pawlenty is the least offensive governor running today. That's damning with faint praise. He didn't show me anything in the first debate. He supposedly had an economic plan out this week but I saw little coverage. I suppose I'll have to seek it out.
That is a very reasonable approach.
First choice is Michelle Bachman, maybe, maybe Pawlenty.
If Rick Perry runs, I'll give him a very good and long look, I like him more then Pawlenty, but between him and Bachman, it would be a toughie.
I'll admit, if Palin doesn't run, I'd give weight to who she endorses.
That said, I could not, under any circumstances, ever vote for Romney or Huntsman.
I also am not on the Hermin Cain bandwagon, simply because I have absolutly no way of knowing if he is saying what he is saying because he wants to win, or if he really believes in it, he has never held office, I have no idea if he would be a guy who talks conservative and then governs like a liberal or not. I can trust him, but I can't verify, so thats a no go.
I also am not part of the Ron Paul or Johnson clique, but I do respect them at least.
BTW, some posters have a "Palin or bust" attitude, and I think one freeper was planning on living in a cave as a hermit if she didn't run.....so take that for what its worth.
Does he have the balls the restlessly attack Obama’s pathetic record?
I like Santorum also.
Um, no. They don't.
Sarah Palin is their worst fear, and the GOP-E's also.
She represents the end of the line for all the establishment, both democrat and republican.
The attempt to destroy her is still underway, but the most recent [her emails] has just backfired!
click to thread
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.