In Randolph the guy lived there. The woman had clearly moved out and had, in fact, GONE TO CANADA.
If you want to apply this case to the situation in Indiana note that the woman lived there and the guy had got his stuff and moved out!
The USSC ruled in favor of the occupant who lived there ALONE ~ as would they rule in favor of the woman in this case because she lived there ALONE.
Was Georgia or Randolf the woolly? If one was Columbian, why did they move to Canada? Wouldnt prehistoric elephants hanging out at the USSC have made a more prominent news story?