Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 21twelve

Probably, but the law also allows you to kill your unborn child too. There is the law and then there is the LAW.


33 posted on 05/20/2011 7:55:30 PM PDT by HerrBlucher ("It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged." G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: HerrBlucher
If the old man hadn't been deceased, I'd support returning it to him.

To heirs? That's very complicated. You don't know the relationship the man had to his children. It appears they didn't know a thing about the stash of cash which suggests he didn't want them to know about it.

Also, it's likely there was be a formal estate. The administrator of the estate, if you chose not to keep the cash acquired with the house, should've been informed of the money rather than children directly.

It's possible he may find himself owing taxes on it, even after giving it up, and the children could as well (either as a gift or inheritance). It depends how the law sees things. Was the money "his" by virtue of buying the home? If so, he owes taxes on it. Did he then gift the money to these other, unrelated people? It was certainly a taxable amount in that case too.

36 posted on 05/20/2011 8:11:20 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Face it: Obama will be president until Fri., Jan. 20, 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson