Replies

>>”There is no correlation between the strike and the solar eruption; it was just a coincidence.” <<

Yeah, right. Who ya gonna b’lieve, us or yer lyin’ eyes?

Well, I guess that it proves that correlation isn’t causation, huh?

>>”NASA officials also explained that they have proof, through the Solar Dynamics Observatory (a spacecraft that monitors the sun), that the solar eruption occurred prior to the collision with the comet.” <<

And the offishul NASA honchos do not believe in and will do anything they can to deny and denigrate the theory of the “electric universe”, which posits that comets have electrical charges that interact with the planets and the sun, among other things.

Since they can’t “see” (or acknowledge) the electrostatic charge of the comet that is interacting with the sun *before* it actually physically hits the corona and which could be the cause of the huge mass ejection of plasma, there has to be “no connection” between the two. Because if they accepted the electrical charges of cometary bodies, they’d have to revise their pet theories of comets being “snowballs” of different flavors of “ice” that is “blown off” the snowball by the solar wind.

Between James Hanson and NASA’s lying about climate, and the cover ups of many things that have been found/seen on Mars by the rovers, I find it hard to give much credence to anything NASA puts out unless it’s confirmed by other ‘non-biased’ parties or experts. Even then, I wonder how much is true.