I’m curious - you started posting a couple of days ago and appear to be familiar with a lot of legalese and details in connection with 0bama’s non-eligibility; yet have not taken a clear position yourself.
Where have you been reading and posting before you registered on FR?
And if you say something like “I’ve lurked on FR for a long time” I guarantee no one will believe you. If you have read here, you posted here.
Sorry, but I haven’t posted before, anywhere. Believe it, or not, as you like.
I had a mate who was into the whole issue, so I heard a lot about it a while back.
The INS files got me fascinated again, so I read around. I’ve seen files like that before, used to be a part of my job. A bogus marriage if I’ve ever seen one, and a bad, bad, man too. He needed a “marriage”, she needed a husband. I get that.
As for my view on the President, I’m kind of agnostic. There are so many lies/misconceptions and misdirections on both sides I find it hard to make up my mind.
There’s certainly something very wrong with President Obama’s narrative. I’m about 95% certain he either isn’t eligible, or he has some kind of legal problem related to his citizenship. Damned if I know what though.
Why are the birth certificates so screwed with? They are.
Why are all the dates so screwed with? They are.
Why are the details so foggy? They are.
I’ve got a suspicious mind. There’s a twist in the whole deal but I can’t make out what it is.
Not to say I don’t have a couple of ideas though.
I’d look at Indonesia rather than Kenya.
I’d look at the 14th Amendment and International law rather than Article II eligibility.
I’d think about the whole thing being misdirection.
I’d do that because we’re being directed to look at Kenya and Article II.
Why an admission against interest?
Why are we always made to look at Barack Obama, Sr, and not Lolo Soetoro?
Think I’ll give up though. I know when I’ve outstayed my welcome.