That's the way anybody would read it and that is total garbage. There is terribly little genetic variation in the entire human race, less than within a typical group of 50 African monkeys of the same species. Neanderthal DNA on the other hand was halfway between ours and that of a chimpanzee. If whites were even partially descended from Neanderthals the genetic difference between whites and the other two races would be huge.
Human genes and Neanderthal genes are 99.5% identical.
Human genes and chimpanzee genes are 98% identical.
It is estimated that only 1-4% of the DNA of anyone with non-African ancestry is of Neanderthal origins. So of 100 ancestors at the time of gene mixing - some 99 to 96 of them would be human and only 1 to 4 of them Neanderthal.
Thus your idea that the difference between non-Africans (not just “whites” but all Asians, Islanders, Persians, Arabs, Europeans, etc) and African people would be much larger is pure bunk.
First there IS more difference in DNA between Africans and non-Africans than between any other group and the rest of humanity.
Secondly your assertion that Neanderthal DNA was halfway between ours and chimps is absolutely wrong.
Thirdly, mixing in 1 to 4% of something 99.5% identical is not going to add up to a “huge” genetic difference.
Someone once said we share something like 30% DNA or a carrot.
There is no way that Neanderthal are midway between humans and chimps. The common ancestor of humans and chimps was at least 6 million years ago. The common ancestor of Neanderthal was around 1/2 million ya. See below and the link for the entire article Unfortunately the chart did not copy but if you look at the article the bottom chart shows most emphatically that Neanderthal is much closer to humans than chimps are, definitely NOT midway:
The first complete Neandertal mtDNA genome
In 2008, the first complete sequencing of Neandertal mtDNA was announced (Green et al. 2008). A complete mtDNA genome of 16,565 base pairs was extracted from a 38,000 year old fossil from the Vindija cave in Croatia. As Krings et al. 2007 had done, the authors created a graph showing the numbers of base pair differences for humans, chimps and the Neandertal when compared against humans. Because they were able to compare across the whole genome rather than a small portion of it, the differences between humans and the Neandertal was far more striking:
Green: human/human comparisons; Red: human/N’tal comparisons; Blue: human/chimp comparisons.
X axis, the number of sequence differences; Y axis, the fraction of pairwise comparisons. (Green et al. 2008)
Among the humans, the sequences had between 2 and 118 differences. The number of differences between the human mtDNAs and the Neandertal mtDNA varies from 201 to 234. The miniscule overlap between the human figures and the Neandertal figures in the original graph has disappeared and instead there is now a sizeable gap between the human and Neandertal results. Green et al. concluded that:
Analysis of the assembled sequence unequivocally establishes that the Neandertal mtDNA falls outside the variation of extant human mtDNAs, and allows an estimate of the divergence date between the two mtDNA lineages of 660,000 ± 140,000 years.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/mtDNA.html