[Matchett-PI]

"Oh, I see, you are a preterist."

Correction: "PARTIAL" preterist. Full/hyper preterism is heresy.

Partial preterism has also been the orthodox /primary/ historic position of the Universal Church. It was only about about 160 years ago that increasing numbers of professing Christians started to give more credence to the notes Schofield wrote in his Bible than they did to the actual Scriptures.

[musicman]

Less Than $13k To Go!!
Just A Reminder
Please Don't Forget
To Donate To FR

[Quix]

I thought you were aware that we’ve traced our dispy perspective back to the early church era . . . and certainly many hundreds of years before Darby, Scholfield et al.

Such documentation has been posted on FR several times.

I think Giovanna keeps much better track of that than I do.

[Quix]

It still boggles my mind that anyone thinks that the Olivet discourse was fulfilled in AD70.

What nonsense.

[marbren]

Correction: "PARTIAL" preterist.

So Partial preterists, like you, are sort of amill and believe in a future bodily resurrection on judgment day like mainline amill protestants and roman catholics, while full preterists believe the resurrection already occurred in AD 70?

Is Gagdad Bob partial preterist?