Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Moron. One, we got the information from Gitmo, which was a triumph all in itself, and second, when we found out where Bin Laden was hiding and we asked for permission to take him out, what was Zero going to say? No? He couldn’t. He had to go along with it.


8 posted on 05/02/2011 7:34:53 AM PDT by bergmeid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bergmeid

“Moron. One, we got the information from Gitmo, which was a triumph all in itself, and second, when we found out where Bin Laden was hiding and we asked for permission to take him out, what was Zero going to say? No? He couldn’t. He had to go along with it.”

If I understand this correctly, we did not get permission. We did not consult with Pakistani intelligence and we did not use Pakistani military in the raid.

In other words, Clinton could have done the same exact thing when he knew of Bin Ladens location, but instead claimed that international law forbade that.

So...... Was Clinton lying? Or, did Obama break the law?

If you want to go political on this, this is the question we should all be asking today. Because if Clinton was lying, then yes, we can connect him directly to September 11, which if true, just eliminated Hillary if she thought she could sneak in the race somehow.


35 posted on 05/02/2011 8:02:26 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson