How do you know that? And even if it were true that the Founders intended to reject "British citizenship concepts," why is that relevant? We care not about intent; we care only about what a reasonable person in 1788 would have understood "natural-born citizen" to have meant.
Would he have defined it based on a specific French-to-English translation of a Swiss legalist's writings? Or would he have defined it much as how "natural-born subject" had been defined in English common law for centuries leading to the ratification?
There's a reason why in Minor Chief Justice Waite resorted to "common law" and not de Vattel to ascertain the meaning of "natural-born citizen."
Thank you for admitting you are an anti-American scumbag.