To: brityank
To: Abd al-Rahiim
Yes, it is very much judicial activism, and it based upon gross misstatements and misrepresentations of fact. Furthermore, it is not a binding precedent. It is a false opinion, despite its claim to be an authoritative opinion. Remember, the Republican Party is responsible for the ineligible and unlawful Arthur Administration, and responsible for the unlawful appointment of Justice Gray. The votes and decisions of Justice Gray and other Arthur appointments should have been voided and nullified for ineligibility and conflict of interest, insofar as Justice Gray's appointment to SCOTUS was utterly dependent upon Chester Arthur not being removed from the Office of the President for ineligibility.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson