Not defensive in the least, just over it, as far as attempting to convey information to you. Funny you purport yourself to have been manning some rampart since 2008 when your presence on any eligibility thread has been negligible. You know no argument by heart, you've tugged no loose "strands," neither here nor there. You do, however, deserve such an abrupt and crude rejoinder. You are not sincere, you latch onto snippets and launch into some strange soliloquy that has no relation to the comment to which you've purported to respond.
It's tiresome and it's pointless, and so I leave you to your tangential commentary and your very poor understanding of the English common law to which you consistently and constantly defer.
Prior to BHO II's releasing his "long form" birth certificate last week, the last time I discussed with a birther on FR was back in August 9, 2009. I got the same response from savedbygrace as I got from you: an insistence that you've got case law on your side followed by an inability to produce the goods and finally, a remark that it's not worth your time to continue discussing with me.
I understand that you'd think I'm annoying based on my questions and "demands," but from my perspective, both of you claimed to have goods and then failed to (or refused to) deliver.