It looks like this part was edited out by a user named Weazie who does not have an active account. They removed it several times and posted the comment along the lines of stop this, move it to the discussion page.
With Wikipedia, there is an easy solution, add it back. It is a Wiki after all.
So go put it back.
Wikipedia can be edited by anyone.
..at that, unregistered user Weazie has been pretty active at removing it when it was added saying usually it isn’t relevant to today in the notes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natural_Born_Citizen_Clause&action=history
There is a reason serious scholars (and even students) don’t use Wikipedia for any reason...
If where he was born was never the real issue, why did so many birthers waste so much time on it? There was never an ounce of evidence that he was born anywhere else, and lots of evidence that he was born in Hawaii. There was just a question as to why he wasn't releasing his birth certificate. Nothing wrong with just asking that question, but anyone who put forth theories about him being born in Kenya just made all the other issues sound like crackpot stuff.
No court is going to agree with the dual citizenship argument, and people don't care. Time to focus on what Obama is doing to the country right now, not the birther dead end.
Wikipedia is to research and information what sand castles are to the art of sculpture.
Calling Monica Crowley, can you accidentally talk about this next time you’re on Fox... thanks...
I learned a long time ago, if i think it is of interest, I take a snapshot of the page.
There is a nice firefox add on that will do this for you. called simply “screenshot”
save everything today, because tomorrow .. it may well not be there
It is not an “issue” as most voters in the country only care about the price of fuel and whether or not they can continue to watch American Idol. God forbid the common folk actually attempt to learn historical standards.