Boxes #20 & #22. Notice how the last number 1 in the year 1961 is darker than the rest of the stamped date. Explainable or doctored?
Another issue, which may have been pointed out elsewhere: Obama’s number on the certificate is 10641. He was born on 8/4 and the certificate was accepted on 8/8 (which itself is another issue). The certificates of twin daughters born on 8/5 and not accepted until 8/11 were numbered 10637 and 10638. Same hospital, too.
I’m wondering what Corsi has to say about all this.
I am a graphic artist and I often save pdfs from Illustrator. When you save as pdf, you get a dialogue box with options. One of the options is to “Preserve Illustrator editing capabilities”. I usually uncheck this option as that will make a larger file. If you are not careful, you can leave that checked on. I believe that is probably what happened here.
Why they messed with it in layers and what it looked like originally...I have no idea.
Here is a real certificate.
http://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/nordykebirthcertificate1.jpg
Notice the file number..the filing date Aug 11 1961 with File number 61 10637
The Obama filing date is BEFORE and so is the date of birth...The filing number is 61 10641 which is a later number.
Obamas number should be lower or less than 61 10637..Not Larger!
See the problem?
OCR might account for one extra layer, but it cannot account for the mismatch of the curve in the print (which matches Nordyke perfectly) vs. the lack of curve in the security paper pattern.
Here is obama’s new b/c with the layers removed. You can see how the printed lines bend down to appear that the paper is bent down, but a careful examination of the security paper pattern shows that the security-paper line-pattern is STRAIGHT! That can only happen on a photo-shopped forgery! No copier or camera could do that. That ONE item proves it’s a forgery. They’re BUSTED!
http://freedomtorch.com/images/obama-birth-certificate-long-form.png