Replies

To: grundle

in order for it to be 288, it would need to read:

48/(2(9+3))

7 posted on 04/12/2011 1:35:23 PM PDT by stefanbatory (Insert witty tagline here)

To: stefanbatory

damn...i have that backwards...in order for it to be “2” that is what you would need. 288 is correct.

12 posted on 04/12/2011 1:36:54 PM PDT by stefanbatory (Insert witty tagline here)

To: stefanbatory

in order for it to be 288, it would need to read: 48/(2(9+3))

in order for it to be ~~288~~ 2, it would need to read: 48/(2(9+3)) You got it backward.

40 posted on 04/12/2011 1:48:51 PM PDT by RobertClark (On a long enough timeline the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794