Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BoringGuy

But there IS NO PARENTHESIS before the 2. You’re implying it. So the operation is to do the math outside any parenthesis first. Thus the answer is 288.


66 posted on 04/12/2011 1:57:41 PM PDT by mentor2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: mentor2k

Thank you.. that’s the way I see it (and learned it) :)

Bikk


71 posted on 04/12/2011 1:59:57 PM PDT by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: mentor2k
Half say 288, half say 2, so if John Boehner were to negotiate this deal, the answer would be 38.5 and we won, {we also gave the other guys both calculators}.

Man, do we know how to solve problems.

78 posted on 04/12/2011 2:00:53 PM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: mentor2k
But there IS NO PARENTHESIS

There is also no multiplication operator (*) between the 2 and the 9+3. So what we are looking at is a factor, not a multiplication operation x(y+z) is the same as (xy+xz) where x*(y+z) would fall to order of operations as a multiplication operation.
82 posted on 04/12/2011 2:02:14 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: mentor2k
You are correct. I was attempting to show the accociation created by the LACK of an operator between the 2 and the (9+3). Obviously poorly.

Others have explained it much more clearly. Sorry for the confusion.

86 posted on 04/12/2011 2:04:03 PM PDT by BoringGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson