To: BoringGuy
But there IS NO PARENTHESIS before the 2. You’re implying it. So the operation is to do the math outside any parenthesis first. Thus the answer is 288.
66 posted on
04/12/2011 1:57:41 PM PDT by
mentor2k
To: mentor2k
Thank you.. that’s the way I see it (and learned it) :)
Bikk
71 posted on
04/12/2011 1:59:57 PM PDT by
Bikkuri
To: mentor2k
Half say 288, half say 2, so if John Boehner were to negotiate this deal, the answer would be 38.5 and we won, {we also gave the other guys both calculators}.
Man, do we know how to solve problems.
78 posted on
04/12/2011 2:00:53 PM PDT by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages.)
To: mentor2k
But there IS NO PARENTHESIS
There is also no multiplication operator (*) between the 2 and the 9+3. So what we are looking at is a factor, not a multiplication operation x(y+z) is the same as (xy+xz) where x*(y+z) would fall to order of operations as a multiplication operation.
To: mentor2k
You are correct. I was attempting to show the accociation created by the LACK of an operator between the 2 and the (9+3). Obviously poorly.
Others have explained it much more clearly. Sorry for the confusion.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson